LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE
LHTC.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc) and QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - LHTC.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care while QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LHTC.DE returned 5.88%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for QDVG.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LHTC.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVG.DE.
Performance
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHTC.DE achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than QDVG.DE's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LHTC.DE has underperformed QDVG.DE with an annualized return of 5.88%, while QDVG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
LHTC.DE
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHTC.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc | -2.55% | 7.11% | 3.92% | 7.59% | -6.20% | 25.48% | -1.95% | 27.54% | 2.95% | 4.36% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHTC.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between LHTC.DE and QDVG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LHTC.DE
QDVG.DE
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LHTC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.21 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 2.96 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LHTC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.89 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than QDVG.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHTC.DE and QDVG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHTC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.53% | -26.77% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -10.74% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.48% | -22.70% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.48% | -22.70% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.48% | -26.77% | +0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.60% | -7.31% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -5.35% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 4.41% | +1.26% |
Volatility
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) at 5.24%. This indicates that LHTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHTC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.24% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 10.23% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 14.70% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 14.48% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 15.77% | -0.20% |
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHTC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHTC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LHTC.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LHTC.DE and QDVG.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LHTC.DE.
LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LHTC.DE and 0.15% for QDVG.DE.
Find the right allocation for LHTC.DE and QDVG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer