PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHTC.DE achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LHTC.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 5.88%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


LHTC.DE

1D
3.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
5.88%

LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
7.96%
YTD
20.63%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
-2.55%7.11%3.92%7.59%-6.20%25.48%-1.95%27.54%2.95%4.36%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LHTC.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between LHTC.DE and LYMS.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHTC.DE
LHTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHTC.DELYMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

3.77

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.89

11.23

-10.35

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHTC.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LHTC.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

2.40

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.94

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.08

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.77

-0.33

Drawdowns

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHTC.DE and LYMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHTC.DELYMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-50.00%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-10.02%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.48%

-26.74%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.48%

-31.12%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.48%

-31.12%

+4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.60%

-0.86%

-10.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-8.78%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

3.37%

+2.30%

Volatility

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that LHTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHTC.DELYMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

4.37%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

10.99%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

15.73%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

19.91%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

19.68%

-4.11%

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHTC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHTC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LHTC.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHTC.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LHTC.DE.

LHTC.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LHTC.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHTC.DE and LYMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer