PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHCIX vs. SHSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Health Care Fund (LHCIX) and BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio (SHSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHCIX achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly lower than SHSAX's -2.94% return.


LHCIX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.46%
YTD
-3.34%
6M
-4.93%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*

SHSAX

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.38%
YTD
-2.94%
6M
-3.69%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LHCIX
Lord Abbett Health Care Fund
-3.34%17.94%7.60%3.20%-11.79%8.39%37.19%8.05%
SHSAX
BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio
-2.94%15.85%3.73%3.59%-5.94%11.88%19.44%11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LHCIX and SHSAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019

0.86

The correlation between LHCIX and SHSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHCIX vs. SHSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHCIX
LHCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LHCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LHCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SHSAX
SHSAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SHSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SHSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Health Care Fund (LHCIX) and BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio (SHSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LHCIXSHSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.20

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.62

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

3.91

+0.03

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the SHSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHCIX and SHSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHCIX drawdown since its inception was -27.92%, smaller than the maximum SHSAX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHCIX and SHSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHCIXSHSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.92%

-35.49%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-9.87%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.27%

-16.08%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-17.99%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.51%

-5.73%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-6.17%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

4.08%

+1.39%

Volatility

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Health Care Fund (LHCIX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio (SHSAX) at 4.95%. This indicates that LHCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHCIXSHSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.95%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

10.65%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

14.14%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

14.44%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

16.56%

+4.18%

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHCIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than SHSAX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHCIX vs. SHSAX - Dividend Comparison

LHCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SHSAX's 10.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHCIX
Lord Abbett Health Care Fund
0.37%0.36%0.57%0.00%0.14%7.40%11.70%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHSAX
BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio
10.96%10.63%9.18%3.84%7.44%9.20%4.34%3.89%8.56%3.53%2.43%12.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHCIX and SHSAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LHCIX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to SHSAX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LHCIX dropped -27.92% vs SHSAX's -35.49%.

LHCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHCIX and SHSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer