LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) and MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - LGUS.L tracks the L&G US Equity UCITS ETF while MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LGUS.L returned 21.64% vs 22.34% for MWOZ.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.

Performance

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LGUS.L is traded in USD, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGUS.L having a 10.34% return and MWOZ.L slightly lower at 10.18%.

LGUS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 9.90%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: —

MWOZ.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 9.01%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 1Y: 22.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF	10.34%	15.28%
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	10.18%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LGUS.L and MWOZ.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.89

The correlation between LGUS.L and MWOZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUS.L

LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MWOZ.L

MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGUS.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.87	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.77	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	2.55	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.99	10.83	-0.84

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUS.L and MWOZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUS.L and MWOZ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGUS.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-17.73%	-16.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.58%	-8.81%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.23%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-2.00%	-3.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.07%	+0.16%

Volatility

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) is 2.86%, while Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that LGUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGUS.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	3.05%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	9.24%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	11.99%	+0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	15.10%	+1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	15.10%	+3.00%

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LGUS.L and MWOZ.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGUS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison

LGUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

Position	TTM	2025
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	1.19%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGUS.L and MWOZ.L in my portfolio?

LGUS.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGUS.L or MWOZ.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGUS.L or MWOZ.L?

LGUS.L and MWOZ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

What is the main difference between LGUS.L and MWOZ.L?

LGUS.L tracks L&G US Equity UCITS ETF, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi.