LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L
LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - LGUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR, while IDFF.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGUS.L returned 12.54%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for IDFF.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDFF.L.
Performance
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGUS.L achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 23.86% return.
LGUS.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- —
IDFF.L
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 1Y
- 42.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.01% | 17.98% | 25.09% | 28.66% | -20.46% | 27.91% | 21.16% | 30.91% | -9.25% |
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 23.86% | 39.49% | 12.16% | 1.47% | -21.79% | -9.20% | 25.91% | 17.27% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGUS.L and IDFF.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LGUS.L and IDFF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGUS.L
IDFF.L
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGUS.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.27 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 9.75 | -0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -64.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUS.L and IDFF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGUS.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -64.08% | +29.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.58% | -13.06% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | -19.77% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -43.26% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -13.06% | +11.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -18.18% | +12.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 4.40% | -2.17% |
Volatility
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) is 3.15%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that LGUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGUS.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 10.68% | -7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 22.20% | -12.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 24.91% | -12.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 22.34% | -5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 20.83% | -2.73% |
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGUS.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison
LGUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.39% | 1.13% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 2.29% |
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGUS.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.
LGUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDFF.L is Asia Pacific Equities. LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR, while IDFF.L tracks MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUS.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.
Find the right allocation for LGUS.L and IDFF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer