LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BBUS.L (BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LGUS.L tracks the Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR while BBUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGUS.L returned 12.84%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for BBUS.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LGUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBUS.L.

Performance

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGUS.L having a 10.45% return and BBUS.L slightly lower at 9.96%.

LGUS.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 1Y: 22.44%
• 3Y*: 20.44%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —

BBUS.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 8.68%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 1Y: 21.80%
• 3Y*: 19.98%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	10.45%	17.98%	25.09%	28.66%	-20.46%	27.91%	21.16%	14.15%
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc	9.96%	17.54%	24.98%	27.64%	-19.96%	27.64%	20.13%	13.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LGUS.L and BBUS.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019	0.97

The correlation between LGUS.L and BBUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUS.L

LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BBUS.L

BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGUS.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.79	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.65	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.52	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.04	10.22	-0.18

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUS.L and BBUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUS.L and BBUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGUS.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-34.26%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.58%	-8.62%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-19.36%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	-25.33%	-0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.61%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-5.29%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.13%	+0.10%

Volatility

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGUS.L	BBUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.97%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	9.39%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	12.14%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	16.19%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	17.72%	+0.38%

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGUS.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGUS.L nor BBUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGUS.L and BBUS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, LGUS.L and BBUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LGUS.L or BBUS.L?

On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGUS.L or BBUS.L?

BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for LGUS.L.

What is the main difference between LGUS.L and BBUS.L?

LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR, while BBUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUS.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.