LGRNX vs. IOLZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LGRNX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class N) and IOLZX (ICON Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGRNX returned 16.18%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for IOLZX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGRNX charges 0.57%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for IOLZX.

Performance

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class N (LGRNX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRNX achieves a -4.53% return, which is significantly lower than IOLZX's 30.41% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRNX has outperformed IOLZX with an annualized return of 16.18%, while IOLZX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.99% annualized return.

LGRNX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -4.53%
• 6M: -5.38%
• 1Y: 6.58%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 16.18%

IOLZX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 6.90%
• YTD: 30.41%
• 6M: 28.81%
• 1Y: 55.27%
• 3Y*: 24.24%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 14.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGRNX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class N	-4.53%	14.13%	35.28%	51.48%	-27.78%	18.73%	31.87%	31.86%	-2.47%	32.75%
IOLZX ICON Equity Fund	30.41%	15.81%	16.87%	12.13%	-17.78%	26.72%	16.00%	38.22%	-16.69%	26.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRNX and IOLZX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between LGRNX and IOLZX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LGRNX vs. IOLZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRNX

LGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 6
LGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
LGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
LGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
LGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
LGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IOLZX

IOLZX Risk / Return Rank: 84
IOLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IOLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IOLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IOLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IOLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class N (LGRNX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGRNX	IOLZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	2.84	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	3.76	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.47	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	3.87	-3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.29	13.68	-12.40

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the IOLZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRNX and IOLZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRNX drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum IOLZX drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRNX and IOLZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRNX	IOLZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.65%	-56.03%	+21.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.81%	-14.35%	-3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.30%	-24.71%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.65%	-27.77%	-6.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.65%	-41.04%	+6.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	0.00%	-7.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-12.61%	+7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.62%	4.05%	+1.57%

Volatility

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class N (LGRNX) is 5.89%, while ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that LGRNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOLZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGRNX	IOLZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	7.46%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	15.90%	-2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	19.56%	-2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.77%	21.56%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.98%	22.43%	-1.45%

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRNX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than IOLZX's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGRNX vs. IOLZX - Dividend Comparison

LGRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than IOLZX's 8.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IOLZX ICON Equity Fund	8.20%	10.69%	22.21%	4.75%	18.57%	14.12%	0.00%	3.46%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGRNX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class N	2.31%	2.21%	5.60%	6.01%	16.45%	4.73%	4.48%	2.79%	5.93%	2.48%	1.55%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGRNX and IOLZX in my portfolio?

LGRNX and IOLZX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGRNX or IOLZX?

IOLZX has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to LGRNX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRNX dropped -34.65% vs IOLZX's -56.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.