LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE
LGQM.DE (Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)) and WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LGQM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the SGI Pan Africa Index, while WEBN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LGQM.DE returned 34.79% vs 26.01% for WEBN.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGQM.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBN.DE.
Performance
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGQM.DE achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 13.12% return.
LGQM.DE
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LGQM.DE Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.72% | 51.40% | -1.64% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.12% | 9.70% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQM.DE and WEBN.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQM.DE
WEBN.DE
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGQM.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.65 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 2.96 | +1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQM.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQM.DE and WEBN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQM.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -21.22% | -40.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -15.77% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.27% | -1.26% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -5.99% | -20.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 8.78% | -0.98% |
Volatility
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) at 3.70%. This indicates that LGQM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQM.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 3.70% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 8.93% | +18.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 24.35% | +7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 21.22% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 21.22% | +1.90% |
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQM.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGQM.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGQM.DE nor WEBN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGQM.DE and WEBN.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while WEBN.DE is Global Equities. LGQM.DE tracks SGI Pan Africa Index, while WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGQM.DE and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQM.DE and WEBN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer