PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGQK.DE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than ZPRA.DE's 4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LGQK.DE has outperformed ZPRA.DE with an annualized return of 11.66%, while ZPRA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.59% annualized return.


LGQK.DE

1D
-1.05%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
9.03%
6M
10.06%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
11.66%

ZPRA.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.47%
YTD
4.42%
6M
3.08%
1Y
10.80%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
6.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGQK.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist
9.03%6.49%12.16%1.67%-1.07%12.33%56.18%16.88%-9.04%10.27%
ZPRA.DE
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.42%9.80%11.25%11.54%-10.70%12.81%-9.50%24.48%-4.62%13.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LGQK.DE and ZPRA.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2013

0.73

The correlation between LGQK.DE and ZPRA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGQK.DE
LGQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LGQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRA.DE
ZPRA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZPRA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGQK.DEZPRA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.93

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

5.05

+1.25

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGQK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the ZPRA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGQK.DE and ZPRA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGQK.DEZPRA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.11

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.39

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.41

+0.15

Drawdowns

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than ZPRA.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQK.DE and ZPRA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGQK.DEZPRA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.96%

-31.54%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.26%

-5.57%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.04%

-13.55%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-21.66%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-31.54%

-5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.76%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-6.47%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.13%

+0.07%

Volatility

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) at 2.71%. This indicates that LGQK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGQK.DEZPRA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.71%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

7.42%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

9.67%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

12.92%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

14.47%

+10.61%

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGQK.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRA.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGQK.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than ZPRA.DE's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGQK.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist
2.64%2.88%5.33%3.78%4.41%3.15%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPRA.DE
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.87%3.01%2.98%2.92%3.64%4.00%3.04%2.62%2.41%1.78%2.25%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGQK.DE and ZPRA.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.

LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while ZPRA.DE tracks S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGQK.DE and 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGQK.DE and ZPRA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer