PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGQK.DE achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than PRAJ.DE's 14.82% return.


LGQK.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
2.54%
6M
10.22%
YTD
13.33%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
5.88%

PRAJ.DE

1D
-2.18%
1M
-3.11%
6M
7.91%
YTD
14.82%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LGQK.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist
13.33%7.00%12.46%1.99%-0.92%12.88%-14.85%
PRAJ.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF
14.82%12.81%13.75%16.27%-11.68%10.20%-99.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LGQK.DE and PRAJ.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.58

The correlation between LGQK.DE and PRAJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGQK.DE
LGQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LGQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAJ.DE
PRAJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PRAJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGQK.DEPRAJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.25

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

10.47

-2.58

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGQK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the PRAJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGQK.DE and PRAJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, smaller than the maximum PRAJ.DE drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQK.DE and PRAJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGQK.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

-99.42%

+60.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.26%

-9.72%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.04%

-16.82%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-18.65%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-98.59%

+98.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-98.79%

+90.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.02%

-0.80%

Volatility

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) is 2.77%, while Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that LGQK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGQK.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

5.97%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

15.66%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

19.34%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

16.72%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

42.68%

-25.93%

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGQK.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAJ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGQK.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while PRAJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGQK.DE
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist
2.96%3.35%5.62%4.07%4.56%3.64%2.82%3.50%3.79%2.96%
PRAJ.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGQK.DE and PRAJ.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAJ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LGQK.DE.

LGQK.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PRAJ.DE is Japan Equities. LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while PRAJ.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGQK.DE and 0.05% for PRAJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGQK.DE and PRAJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer