PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGJG.L is traded in GBp, while VJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VJPU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGJG.L achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly lower than VJPU.L's 20.12% return.


LGJG.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
6.18%
YTD
14.69%
6M
14.39%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

VJPU.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
7.88%
YTD
20.12%
6M
21.04%
1Y
54.82%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LGJG.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
14.69%17.46%10.01%13.64%3.31%
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
20.12%22.15%25.96%28.86%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LGJG.L and VJPU.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.74

The correlation between LGJG.L and VJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGJG.L
VJPU.L

Industrials

24.2%
26.6%

Technology

19.8%
17.4%

Financial Services

17.4%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
12.8%

Communication Services

8.5%
7.1%

Healthcare

5.7%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.8%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
3.4%

Utilities

1.0%
1.3%

Energy

0.7%
1.0%

Industrials

LGJG.L
24.2%
VJPU.L
26.6%

Technology

LGJG.L
19.8%
VJPU.L
17.4%

Financial Services

LGJG.L
17.4%
VJPU.L
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LGJG.L
12.5%
VJPU.L
12.8%

Communication Services

LGJG.L
8.5%
VJPU.L
7.1%

Healthcare

LGJG.L
5.7%
VJPU.L
5.9%

Basic Materials

LGJG.L
3.8%
VJPU.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

LGJG.L
3.7%
VJPU.L
4.2%

Real Estate

LGJG.L
2.7%
VJPU.L
3.4%

Utilities

LGJG.L
1.0%
VJPU.L
1.3%

Energy

LGJG.L
0.7%
VJPU.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGJG.L
LGJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPU.L
VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGJG.LVJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.52

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

6.27

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

21.16

-11.89

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGJG.L and VJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGJG.LVJPU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.88

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.23

-0.59

Drawdowns

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGJG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum VJPU.L drawdown of -24.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGJG.L and VJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGJG.LVJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-24.99%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-8.70%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-24.99%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.28%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-3.58%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.58%

+0.84%

Volatility

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGJG.LVJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.69%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

14.76%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

18.99%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

20.28%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

20.28%

-3.47%

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGJG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGJG.L nor VJPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LGJG.L and VJPU.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

LGJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGJG.L and 0.20% for VJPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGJG.L and VJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer