PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGNY vs. BLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LGGNY vs. BLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legal & General Group Plc (LGGNY) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGNY achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than BLK's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LGGNY has underperformed BLK with an annualized return of 12.62%, while BLK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.


LGGNY

1D
1.91%
1M
7.89%
6M
17.69%
YTD
18.03%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
12.62%

BLK

1D
1.57%
1M
1.06%
6M
-7.20%
YTD
-5.93%
1Y
-6.06%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
14.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGNY vs. BLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGGNY
Legal & General Group Plc
18.03%32.85%-3.49%17.36%-21.83%18.83%-1.17%45.45%-16.11%35.63%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
-5.93%6.55%29.29%17.86%-20.40%29.39%47.21%31.87%-21.59%38.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGNY and BLK is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.36

The correlation between LGGNY and BLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGNY vs. BLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGNY
LGGNY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LGGNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGNY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGNY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BLK
BLK Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLK Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGNY vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General Group Plc (LGGNY) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGGNYBLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.99

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

-0.23

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

-0.47

+4.80

LGGNY vs. BLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the BLK Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGNY and BLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGGNY vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGNY drawdown since its inception was -89.75%, which is greater than BLK's maximum drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGNY and BLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGNYBLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.75%

-60.36%

-29.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-22.45%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.03%

-23.74%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.39%

-43.90%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.54%

-43.90%

-18.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.86%

+15.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.35%

-11.93%

-8.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

10.64%

-4.52%

Volatility

LGGNY vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Legal & General Group Plc (LGGNY) is 5.22%, while BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that LGGNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGNYBLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

8.26%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.31%

21.16%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

26.25%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.83%

26.84%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.71%

27.65%

+5.06%

Dividends

LGGNY vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison

LGGNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than BLK's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
2.20%1.95%1.99%2.46%2.75%1.80%2.01%2.63%3.08%1.95%2.41%2.56%
LGGNY
Legal & General Group Plc
7.34%7.92%9.06%7.34%7.62%5.68%5.86%4.97%6.77%8.42%12.35%4.47%

Financials

LGGNY vs. BLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Legal & General Group Plc and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B6.50B7.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.77B
(LGGNY) Total Revenue
(BLK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LGGNY and BLK have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLK has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to LGGNY (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGGNY dropped -89.75% vs BLK's -60.36%.

LGGNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGNY and BLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer