PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGEU.L is traded in EUR, while CEUR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CEUR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGEU.L having a 10.65% return and CEUR.L slightly higher at 11.17%.


LGEU.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.36%
6M
6.63%
YTD
10.65%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*

CEUR.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.42%
6M
7.86%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGEU.L
L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF
10.65%19.94%6.68%17.97%-11.77%24.90%1.53%30.71%-9.44%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
11.17%17.97%9.96%15.33%-10.81%24.63%-3.27%27.20%-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LGEU.L and CEUR.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.92

The correlation between LGEU.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGEU.L
LGEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGEU.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.13

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

7.92

+0.23

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGEU.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGEU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.27%, smaller than the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -50.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGEU.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.27%

-50.52%

+16.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.05%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-15.75%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-21.40%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.51%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-13.62%

+8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.72%

-0.12%

Volatility

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 3.24%. This indicates that LGEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.24%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

10.89%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

13.03%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

14.35%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.34%

+0.65%

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGEU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGEU.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LGEU.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LGEU.L.

LGEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF, while CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGEU.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGEU.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer