PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFOD.DE achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LFOD.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 2.55%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


LFOD.DE

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-2.18%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
-5.63%
3Y*
-2.00%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
2.55%

LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.25%
YTD
20.63%
6M
19.42%
1Y
37.94%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFOD.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc
-2.18%6.07%-3.94%-1.97%-13.19%23.20%-6.14%23.36%-2.67%12.60%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LFOD.DE and LYMS.DE is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2007

0.40

The correlation between LFOD.DE and LYMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFOD.DE
LFOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LFOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFOD.DELYMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.42

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

3.77

-4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

11.23

-12.16

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFOD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFOD.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFOD.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

2.40

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.94

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

1.08

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.77

-0.36

Drawdowns

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFOD.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFOD.DE and LYMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFOD.DELYMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-50.00%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-10.02%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.51%

-26.74%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-31.12%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-31.12%

+0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.55%

-0.86%

-15.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-8.78%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

3.37%

+2.67%

Volatility

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc (LFOD.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) have volatilities of 4.46% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFOD.DELYMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.37%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

10.99%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

15.73%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

19.91%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

19.68%

-5.50%

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFOD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFOD.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LFOD.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFOD.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Food & Beverage UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFOD.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LFOD.DE.

LFOD.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. LFOD.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Food & Beverage, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LFOD.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFOD.DE and LYMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer