PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFMAX vs. ABYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund (LFMAX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFMAX achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly higher than ABYIX's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, LFMAX has outperformed ABYIX with an annualized return of 3.77%, while ABYIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


LFMAX

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
9.46%
6M
9.32%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
3.77%

ABYIX

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.77%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFMAX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund
9.46%2.56%6.36%-6.69%15.03%-0.17%5.41%12.51%-5.38%2.69%
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
7.16%1.62%1.11%-3.29%17.06%3.39%7.92%8.84%-6.15%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LFMAX and ABYIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.78

The correlation between LFMAX and ABYIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFMAX vs. ABYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFMAX
LFMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LFMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LFMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ABYIX
ABYIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ABYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ABYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund (LFMAX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFMAXABYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

5.57

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.94

13.98

+1.96

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the ABYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFMAX and ABYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFMAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, which is greater than ABYIX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFMAX and ABYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFMAXABYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.16%

-17.13%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-2.85%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.95%

-14.00%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

-14.66%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.54%

-14.74%

+2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-1.50%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-6.64%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.14%

-0.27%

Volatility

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund (LFMAX) is 1.23%, while Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that LFMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFMAXABYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.88%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

5.96%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

7.80%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

7.96%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.59%

8.03%

-0.44%

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFMAX has a 2.13% expense ratio, which is higher than ABYIX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFMAX vs. ABYIX - Dividend Comparison

LFMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than ABYIX's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
1.24%1.33%2.10%2.03%15.24%3.68%1.54%8.70%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.24%
LFMAX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund
2.69%2.94%2.88%2.96%14.38%4.79%5.65%4.48%2.83%5.98%1.97%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFMAX and ABYIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABYIX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to LFMAX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFMAX dropped -23.16% vs ABYIX's -17.13%.

LFMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFMAX and ABYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer