PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGIX vs. VPMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund (LFGIX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGIX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than VPMCX's 25.40% return.


LFGIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
5.47%
YTD
9.35%
6M
8.48%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
29.21%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

VPMCX

1D
0.35%
1M
12.86%
YTD
25.40%
6M
26.79%
1Y
58.79%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
17.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LFGIX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund
9.35%15.06%50.90%34.10%-38.87%12.95%86.60%16.00%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
25.40%29.60%13.23%28.16%-15.22%21.64%17.16%18.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGIX and VPMCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2019

0.78

The correlation between LFGIX and VPMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFGIX vs. VPMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGIX
LFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VPMCX
VPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund (LFGIX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFGIXVPMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.65

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

5.12

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

23.59

-20.67

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the VPMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGIX and VPMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFGIXVPMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

3.75

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.91

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.81

-0.08

Drawdowns

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum VPMCX drawdown of -50.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGIX and VPMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGIXVPMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.15%

-50.45%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.60%

-11.73%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.57%

-20.56%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.15%

-25.25%

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.38%

-7.41%

-6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

2.54%

+5.35%

Volatility

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund (LFGIX) is 5.09%, while Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that LFGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFGIXVPMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

6.18%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.52%

12.85%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

16.02%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.51%

18.26%

+8.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.61%

19.19%

+8.42%

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VPMCX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFGIX vs. VPMCX - Dividend Comparison

LFGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFGIX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%16.32%6.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
13.04%16.36%6.62%7.16%9.85%10.08%9.74%7.15%8.32%4.53%5.05%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFGIX and VPMCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPMCX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to LFGIX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGIX dropped -46.15% vs VPMCX's -50.45%.

VPMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFGIX and VPMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer