LFGIX vs. FTQGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFGIX (Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LFGIX returned 12.10%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for FTQGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFGIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTQGX.

Performance

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund (LFGIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGIX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 26.34% return.

LFGIX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 5.47%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 22.24%
• 3Y*: 29.21%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: —

FTQGX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 10.43%
• YTD: 26.34%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 52.54%
• 3Y*: 30.42%
• 5Y*: 16.78%
• 10Y*: 19.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LFGIX Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund	9.35%	15.06%	50.90%	34.10%	-38.87%	12.95%	86.60%	16.00%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	26.34%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	26.91%	33.41%	22.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGIX and FTQGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2019	0.90

The correlation between LFGIX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LFGIX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGIX

LFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 13
LFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
LFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
LFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
LFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund (LFGIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFGIX	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.72	-1.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	3.47	-1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.46	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	4.24	-3.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.92	18.25	-15.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGIX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFGIX	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	2.72	-1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.78	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.51	+0.22

Drawdowns

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGIX drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGIX and FTQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGIX	FTQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.15%	-61.29%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.60%	-12.76%	-8.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.57%	-26.84%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.15%	-32.31%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	0.00%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.38%	-14.19%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.89%	2.96%	+4.93%

Volatility

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund (LFGIX) is 5.09%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that LFGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFGIX	FTQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	7.14%	-2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.52%	15.42%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.26%	19.91%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.51%	21.67%	+4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.61%	21.57%	+6.04%

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFGIX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

LFGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	9.85%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%
LFGIX Lord Abbett Focused Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	16.32%	6.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFGIX and FTQGX in my portfolio?

LFGIX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFGIX or FTQGX?

FTQGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to LFGIX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGIX dropped -46.15% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.