LFAO vs. VGSH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LFAO (LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF) and VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. LFAO is actively managed, while VGSH is passively managed. Over the past year, LFAO returned -1.13% vs 2.58% for VGSH. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LFAO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGSH.

Performance

LFAO vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF (LFAO) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFAO achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.77% return.

LFAO

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -2.77%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -2.61%
• 1Y: -1.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.10%

VGSH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 1.73%
• ALL TIME*: 1.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LFAO LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF	$25.23K	$13.84K	$16.25K
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF	$133.56M	$160.92M	$191.51M

LFAO vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LFAO LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF	-2.61%	5.65%	-8.36%
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF	0.77%	5.07%	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LFAO and VGSH is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024	0.70

The correlation between LFAO and VGSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LFAO vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFAO

LFAO Risk / Return Rank: 11
LFAO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
LFAO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LFAO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LFAO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LFAO Martin Ratio Rank: 11

VGSH

VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 91
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFAO vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF (LFAO) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFAO	VGSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	2.36	-2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	3.74	-3.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.49	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.01	3.51	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.01	13.46	-13.45

LFAO vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFAO Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFAO and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LFAO vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFAO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFAO and VGSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFAO	VGSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.12%	-5.70%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.86%	-0.88%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.78%	-0.05%	-5.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-0.59%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	0.23%	+2.36%

Volatility

LFAO vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF (LFAO) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.36%. This indicates that LFAO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFAO	VGSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.78%	0.36%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.23%	1.01%	+4.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.83%	1.32%	+5.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.98%	1.98%	+6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.98%	1.58%	+6.40%

LFAO vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFAO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LFAO vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

LFAO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than VGSH's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFAO LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF	11.20%	14.33%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF	3.50%	4.00%	4.18%	3.31%	1.15%	0.66%	1.74%	2.28%	1.79%	1.10%	0.84%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFAO and VGSH in my portfolio?

LFAO and VGSH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFAO or VGSH?

LFAO has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to VGSH (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFAO dropped -10.12% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

Which ETF is better, LFAO or VGSH?

On 1-year performance, VGSH leads with 2.58% vs -1.13% for LFAO. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFAO or VGSH?

Over the 1-year period, VGSH has performed better with a 2.58% return vs -1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFAO or VGSH?

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LFAO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFAO or VGSH?

LFAO has the higher dividend yield at 11.20%, compared with 3.50% for VGSH.

What is the main difference between LFAO and VGSH?

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFAO and 0.03% for VGSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.