LENS vs. PJBF
LENS (Sarmaya Thematic ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. LENS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.
Performance
LENS vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LENS
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 40.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJBF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LENS vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF | 0.58% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LENS vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank
LENS
PJBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LENS vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LENS | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LENS vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LENS drawdown since its inception was -24.55%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LENS and PJBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LENS | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.55% | 0.00% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.90% | 0.00% | -21.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | 0.00% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility
LENS vs. PJBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LENS | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.87% | 0.00% | +27.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 0.00% | +25.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 0.00% | +25.65% |
LENS vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LENS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LENS vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison
LENS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF | 1.56% | 1.60% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LENS.
LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.
They also come from different issuers: Sarmaya Partners and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LENS and 0.59% for PJBF.
Find the right allocation for LENS and PJBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer