LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L
LEMV.L (Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)) and FEUD.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares) are both Europe Equities funds - LEMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while FEUD.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEMV.L returned 6.86%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for FEUD.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEMV.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FEUD.L.
Performance
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEMV.L achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FEUD.L's 12.20% return.
LEMV.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
FEUD.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 3.75% | 17.91% | 9.36% | 4.61% | -9.18% | 15.18% | 6.43% | 12.42% | -5.77% |
FEUD.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares | 12.20% | 47.89% | 4.04% | 10.07% | -9.74% | 13.79% | 0.98% | 17.82% | -15.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEMV.L and FEUD.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LEMV.L and FEUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Utilities
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Industrials
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Financial Services
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Communication Services
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Real Estate
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Technology
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Energy
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Consumer Cyclical
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Healthcare
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Consumer Defensive
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Basic Materials
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEMV.L
FEUD.L
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEMV.L | FEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.47 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 3.54 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 12.62 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEMV.L | FEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 2.59 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.56 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEMV.L drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum FEUD.L drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMV.L and FEUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEMV.L | FEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -34.17% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -10.60% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -14.03% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -23.21% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -0.35% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -6.69% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.85% | -0.16% |
Volatility
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) is 2.82%, while First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that LEMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEMV.L | FEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.98% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 11.64% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 14.52% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 17.64% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 19.90% | -7.41% |
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEMV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FEUD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEMV.L vs. FEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
LEMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUD.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares | 2.77% | 3.05% | 3.72% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 1.75% |
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEMV.L and FEUD.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LEMV.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LEMV.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEUD.L.
LEMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FEUD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LEMV.L and 0.75% for FEUD.L.
Find the right allocation for LEMV.L and FEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer