LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L
LEMB.L (Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist) and EMLP.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - LEMB.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD while EMLP.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEMB.L returned 2.19%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for EMLP.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEMB.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for EMLP.L.
Performance
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LEMB.L is traded in USD, while EMLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEMB.L achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than EMLP.L's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LEMB.L has underperformed EMLP.L with an annualized return of 2.19%, while EMLP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.
LEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
EMLP.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.79% | 12.48% | 0.66% | 9.26% | -16.61% | -2.23% | 4.28% | 13.91% | -4.52% | 8.55% |
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 1.26% | 17.33% | -3.32% | 13.19% | -5.73% | -5.19% | 1.46% | 13.95% | -7.04% | 12.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEMB.L and EMLP.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2013 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEMB.L
EMLP.L
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEMB.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.24 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.48 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 5.10 | +6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEMB.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.34 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.36 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.35 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.18 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than EMLP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB.L and EMLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEMB.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -25.62% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.74% | -5.82% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.59% | -7.37% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.85% | -19.78% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.40% | -20.62% | -6.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -2.92% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -7.17% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.69% | -0.75% |
Volatility
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) have volatilities of 2.05% and 1.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEMB.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.99% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.20% | 5.20% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25% | 6.42% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 9.07% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 9.27% | +0.91% |
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEMB.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP.L's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEMB.L vs. EMLP.L - Dividend Comparison
LEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, while EMLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.20% | 5.29% | 3.59% | 5.90% | 5.73% | 4.49% | 4.12% | 5.12% | 5.18% | 5.14% | 5.41% | 6.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEMB.L and EMLP.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LEMB.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LEMB.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLP.L.
LEMB.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMLP.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LEMB.L and 0.61% for EMLP.L.
Find the right allocation for LEMB.L and EMLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer