LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L
LEMB.L (Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist) and EMLI.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - LEMB.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD while EMLI.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEMB.L returned 2.19%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for EMLI.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEMB.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for EMLI.L.
Performance
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEMB.L achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than EMLI.L's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LEMB.L has underperformed EMLI.L with an annualized return of 2.19%, while EMLI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.
LEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
EMLI.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.79% | 12.48% | 0.66% | 9.26% | -16.61% | -2.23% | 4.28% | 13.91% | -4.52% | 8.55% |
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 1.64% | 16.62% | -3.24% | 13.68% | -5.61% | -5.52% | 1.92% | 13.04% | -6.89% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEMB.L and EMLI.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.56 |
The correlation between LEMB.L and EMLI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEMB.L
EMLI.L
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEMB.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.47 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 5.23 | +6.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEMB.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.29 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.33 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.34 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.23 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than EMLI.L's maximum drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB.L and EMLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEMB.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -25.62% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.74% | -5.67% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.59% | -7.82% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.85% | -19.52% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.40% | -21.08% | -6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -2.80% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -7.31% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.59% | -0.65% |
Volatility
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) have volatilities of 2.05% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEMB.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 2.02% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.20% | 5.40% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25% | 6.49% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 9.89% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 9.59% | +0.59% |
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEMB.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLI.L's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEMB.L vs. EMLI.L - Dividend Comparison
LEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, less than EMLI.L's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 6.55% | 5.81% | 6.33% | 5.70% | 5.21% | 4.50% | 3.68% | 5.24% | 5.83% | 5.76% | 6.69% | 7.09% |
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.20% | 5.29% | 3.59% | 5.90% | 5.73% | 4.49% | 4.12% | 5.12% | 5.18% | 5.14% | 5.41% | 6.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEMB.L and EMLI.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LEMB.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LEMB.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.
LEMB.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMLI.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LEMB.L and 0.61% for EMLI.L.
Find the right allocation for LEMB.L and EMLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer