LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L).

LEMB.L and ACWL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LEMB.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Oct 25, 2018. ACWL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. Both LEMB.L and ACWL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist	-0.89%	12.48%	0.66%	9.26%	-16.61%	-2.23%	4.28%	13.91%	-4.52%	8.55%
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	-1.29%	21.83%	19.36%	17.72%	-16.89%	20.41%	14.43%	19.77%	-1.48%	19.46%

Different Trading Currencies

LEMB.L is traded in USD, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEMB.L achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly higher than ACWL.L's -1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LEMB.L has underperformed ACWL.L with an annualized return of 2.21%, while ACWL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.

LEMB.L

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 8.12%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: 1.26%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

ACWL.L

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -4.40%
• YTD: -1.29%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: 17.55%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: 11.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEMB.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

ACWL.L

Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF

LEMB.L

Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist

Return for Risk

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEMB.L

LEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
LEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ACWL.L

ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEMB.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.94	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.59	+0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	7.71	-0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMB.L and ACWL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEMB.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	1.18	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	1.83	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.64	-1.35

Correlation

The correlation between LEMB.L and ACWL.L is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison

LEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, while ACWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist	5.34%	5.29%	3.59%	5.90%	5.73%	4.49%	4.12%	5.12%	5.18%	5.14%	5.41%	6.69%
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB.L and ACWL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEMB.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.40%	-18.15%	-9.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.84%	-10.51%	+5.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.85%	-18.15%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.40%	-18.15%	-9.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-4.06%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-2.55%	-5.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	2.39%	-1.33%

Volatility

LEMB.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) is 2.36%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that LEMB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEMB.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	5.01%	-2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.35%	9.20%	-5.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.41%	15.61%	-9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.85%	22.46%	-13.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.16%	29.01%	-18.85%