LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L
LEGR.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - LEGR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR.L returned 11.87%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LEGR.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR.L achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.50% return.
LEGR.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 13.44%
- YTD
- 23.50%
- 6M
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 53.05%
- 3Y*
- 36.62%
- 5Y*
- 25.27%
- 10Y*
- 26.30%
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 12.26% | 31.58% | 16.29% | 21.82% | -18.56% | 17.39% | 19.03% | 26.59% | -10.04% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.50% | 24.49% | 41.63% | 59.85% | -29.07% | 35.05% | 42.15% | 50.99% | -5.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR.L and XLKQ.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between LEGR.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
Technology
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
Communication Services
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Industrials
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
Utilities
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Basic Materials
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Healthcare
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Energy
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
-
Real Estate
LEGR.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEGR.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.14 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 9.57 | +2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEGR.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.69 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.09 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.17 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -35.00% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.73% | -16.81% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -26.96% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -35.00% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -3.14% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -5.75% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 5.53% | -2.88% |
Volatility
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) is 5.46%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that LEGR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 6.83% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 14.92% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 19.61% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 23.32% | -6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 22.22% | -3.69% |
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEGR.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.L.
LEGR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for LEGR.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer