PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LEGR.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR.L achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.50% return.


LEGR.L

1D
0.18%
1M
6.50%
YTD
12.26%
6M
16.02%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
13.44%
YTD
23.50%
6M
23.21%
1Y
53.05%
3Y*
36.62%
5Y*
25.27%
10Y*
26.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LEGR.L
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF
12.26%31.58%16.29%21.82%-18.56%17.39%19.03%26.59%-10.04%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
23.50%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%35.05%42.15%50.99%-5.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR.L and XLKQ.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2018

0.72

The correlation between LEGR.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEGR.L
XLKQ.L

Financial Services

42.5%
7.3%

Technology

27.3%
91.2%

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

-

Industrials

5.6%
1.5%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Energy

0.8%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

LEGR.L
42.5%
XLKQ.L
7.3%

Technology

LEGR.L
27.3%
XLKQ.L
91.2%

Communication Services

LEGR.L
8.9%
XLKQ.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

LEGR.L
8.5%
XLKQ.L

-

Industrials

LEGR.L
5.6%
XLKQ.L
1.5%

Utilities

LEGR.L
2.1%
XLKQ.L

-

Basic Materials

LEGR.L
1.6%
XLKQ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

LEGR.L
1.4%
XLKQ.L

-

Healthcare

LEGR.L
1.3%
XLKQ.L

-

Energy

LEGR.L
0.8%
XLKQ.L

-

Real Estate

LEGR.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR.L
LEGR.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LEGR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEGR.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.14

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

9.57

+2.11

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEGR.LXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.69

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.09

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.17

-0.47

Drawdowns

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGR.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-35.00%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-16.81%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-26.96%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.56%

-35.00%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-3.14%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-5.75%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.53%

-2.88%

Volatility

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) is 5.46%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that LEGR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGR.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

6.83%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

14.92%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

19.61%

-5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

23.32%

-6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

22.22%

-3.69%

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEGR.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LEGR.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LEGR.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.L.

LEGR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGR.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer