LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L
LEGR.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) and MKUW.L (Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - LEGR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while MKUW.L tracks the Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR.L returned 11.65%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for MKUW.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEGR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MKUW.L.
Performance
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than MKUW.L's 0.89% return.
LEGR.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- —
MKUW.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 9.29% | 31.58% | 16.31% | 21.81% | -18.56% | 17.39% | 19.03% | 6.76% |
MKUW.L Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.89% | 25.35% | 9.15% | -8.87% | 5.99% | 28.57% | -9.88% | 10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR.L and MKUW.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR.L
MKUW.L
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEGR.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 0.70 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 1.63 | +6.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum MKUW.L drawdown of -37.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR.L and MKUW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -37.76% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.73% | -7.47% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | -14.16% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -25.13% | -6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.04% | -2.89% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -9.42% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.24% | -0.24% |
Volatility
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) at 2.12%. This indicates that LEGR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKUW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 2.12% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 8.09% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 10.37% | +4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 12.77% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 16.50% | +2.06% |
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MKUW.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR.L vs. MKUW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEGR.L nor MKUW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR.L and MKUW.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MKUW.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MKUW.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.L.
LEGR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while MKUW.L tracks Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR.L and 0.50% for MKUW.L.
Find the right allocation for LEGR.L and MKUW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer