LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

LEGR.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) and HTWD.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - LEGR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while HTWD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR.L returned 11.65%/yr vs 20.24%/yr for HTWD.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWD.L.

Performance

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGR.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 57.53% return.

LEGR.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -2.79%
• 6M: 6.75%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: —

HTWD.L

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -6.47%
• 6M: 50.40%
• YTD: 57.53%
• 1Y: 84.50%
• 3Y*: 40.11%
• 5Y*: 20.24%
• 10Y*: 20.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LEGR.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF	9.29%	31.58%	16.31%	21.81%	-18.56%	17.39%	19.03%	26.59%	-8.62%
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF	57.53%	32.26%	25.40%	28.98%	-29.41%	27.78%	36.62%	33.56%	-12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGR.L and HTWD.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2018	0.70

The correlation between LEGR.L and HTWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGR.L

LEGR.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
LEGR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LEGR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LEGR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LEGR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
LEGR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55

HTWD.L

HTWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
HTWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HTWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HTWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HTWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HTWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEGR.L	HTWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	3.04	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.68	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	7.40	-5.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	20.03	-12.32

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the HTWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGR.L and HTWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGR.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum HTWD.L drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR.L and HTWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEGR.L	HTWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.70%	-41.06%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.73%	-11.22%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	-28.22%	+14.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.56%	-41.06%	+9.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-10.43%	+6.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-9.65%	+3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	4.16%	-1.16%

Volatility

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (LEGR.L) is 4.09%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that LEGR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEGR.L	HTWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	10.99%	-6.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	23.75%	-11.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	27.32%	-12.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	23.58%	-6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	21.64%	-3.08%

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEGR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEGR.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison

LEGR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF	1.04%	1.53%	1.18%	2.73%	3.31%	1.13%	1.69%	2.08%	2.79%	1.37%	2.64%	2.65%
LEGR.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEGR.L and HTWD.L in my portfolio?

LEGR.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LEGR.L or HTWD.L?

On fees, HTWD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LEGR.L or HTWD.L?

HTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.L.

What is the main difference between LEGR.L and HTWD.L?

LEGR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HTWD.L tracks HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.