LEAIX vs. RLEMX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LEAIX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio) and RLEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LEAIX returned 10.34%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for RLEMX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LEAIX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RLEMX.

Performance

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAIX achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly lower than RLEMX's 25.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LEAIX having a 10.34% annualized return and RLEMX not far behind at 10.11%.

LEAIX

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -2.03%
• 6M: 10.81%
• YTD: 20.51%
• 1Y: 39.34%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: 10.34%
• ALL TIME*: 11.20%

RLEMX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.35%
• 6M: 14.90%
• YTD: 25.45%
• 1Y: 48.47%
• 3Y*: 25.92%
• 5Y*: 14.59%
• 10Y*: 10.11%
• ALL TIME*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LEAIX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RLEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEAIX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio	20.51%	33.74%	11.41%	12.67%	-21.01%	0.96%	17.39%	20.44%	-16.25%	42.52%
RLEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6	25.45%	41.38%	7.60%	22.42%	-14.86%	5.43%	-0.02%	17.99%	-18.11%	28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LEAIX and RLEMX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.91

The correlation between LEAIX and RLEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LEAIX vs. RLEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEAIX

LEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
LEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RLEMX

RLEMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
RLEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RLEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RLEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RLEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEAIX	RLEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	3.15	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	4.04	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.55	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	4.49	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.43	15.21	-6.78

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the RLEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAIX and RLEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.24%, smaller than the maximum RLEMX drawdown of -44.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAIX and RLEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEAIX	RLEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.24%	-44.12%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	-10.41%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.21%	-14.25%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.37%	-29.17%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.24%	-44.12%	+6.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-1.17%	-8.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.44%	-10.36%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	3.07%	+1.36%

Volatility

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX) at 5.19%. This indicates that LEAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEAIX	RLEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.19%	5.19%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.45%	12.98%	+5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.40%	14.87%	+5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	14.61%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	16.39%	+1.39%

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than RLEMX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

LEAIX vs. RLEMX - Dividend Comparison

LEAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than RLEMX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LEAIX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio	1.58%	1.90%	1.52%	1.93%	3.42%	8.01%	0.84%	1.92%	2.43%	1.15%	1.62%
RLEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6	1.63%	2.05%	3.10%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEAIX and RLEMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, LEAIX and RLEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LEAIX or RLEMX?

LEAIX has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to RLEMX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEAIX dropped -37.24% vs RLEMX's -44.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.