LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO
LEAD.TO (Evolve Future Leadership Fund) and FGEP.TO (Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LEAD.TO returned -3.93% vs 26.16% for FGEP.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEAD.TO charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for FGEP.TO.
Performance
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEAD.TO achieves a -4.13% return, which is significantly lower than FGEP.TO's 17.87% return.
LEAD.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 1Y
- -3.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
FGEP.TO
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.01M | CA$1.01M | CA$1.02M | |
| CA$5.33K | CA$6.18K | CA$7.84K |
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LEAD.TO Evolve Future Leadership Fund | -4.13% | 12.13% | 20.12% |
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 17.87% | 17.44% | 9.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD.TO and FGEP.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LEAD.TO
FGEP.TO
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEAD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.42 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 3.68 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 14.78 | -15.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.80%, which is greater than FGEP.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD.TO and FGEP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEAD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.80% | -14.78% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.65% | -7.14% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -2.18% | -7.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -1.61% | -12.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 1.77% | +8.35% |
Volatility
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO) at 3.09%. This indicates that LEAD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGEP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEAD.TO | FGEP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 3.09% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 9.25% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 11.30% | +7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 12.71% | +9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 12.71% | +8.31% |
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD.TO has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FGEP.TO's 1.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEAD.TO vs. FGEP.TO - Dividend Comparison
LEAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, while FGEP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LEAD.TO Evolve Future Leadership Fund | 11.67% | 9.21% | 5.84% | 7.25% | 9.02% | 5.44% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEAD.TO and FGEP.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LEAD.TO is cheaper at 0.92% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LEAD.TO is cheaper with a 0.92% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for FGEP.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Evolve Funds Group Inc. and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.92% for LEAD.TO and 1.16% for FGEP.TO.
Find the right allocation for LEAD.TO and FGEP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer