PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SC0D.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAD.DE achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than SC0D.DE's 7.29% return.


LEAD.DE

1D
0.54%
1M
4.78%
YTD
9.44%
6M
11.63%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*

SC0D.DE

1D
0.74%
1M
4.75%
YTD
7.29%
6M
8.67%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LEAD.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc
9.44%13.89%6.93%16.25%-11.84%24.71%1.30%
SC0D.DE
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
7.29%22.01%10.91%22.46%-9.02%23.19%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD.DE and SC0D.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2020

0.92

The correlation between LEAD.DE and SC0D.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEAD.DE
LEAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0D.DE
SC0D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SC0D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SC0D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEAD.DESC0D.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.43

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

4.87

+1.13

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the SC0D.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAD.DE and SC0D.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEAD.DESC0D.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.98

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.64

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.46

+0.26

Drawdowns

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum SC0D.DE drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD.DE and SC0D.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEAD.DESC0D.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-38.50%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-10.93%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.59%

-16.54%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-23.38%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.53%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-7.22%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.21%

-0.40%

Volatility

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE) is 4.67%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SC0D.DE) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that LEAD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0D.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEAD.DESC0D.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

4.94%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

12.94%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78%

15.95%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

17.53%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

18.27%

-3.80%

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0D.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LEAD.DE vs. SC0D.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LEAD.DE nor SC0D.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LEAD.DE and SC0D.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SC0D.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0D.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LEAD.DE.

LEAD.DE tracks MSCI Europe ESG Leaders, while SC0D.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LEAD.DE and 0.05% for SC0D.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEAD.DE and SC0D.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer