LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE
LEAD.DE (Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc) and LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - LEAD.DE tracks the MSCI Europe ESG Leaders while LYP6.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEAD.DE returned 8.61%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for LYP6.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LEAD.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYP6.DE.
Performance
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEAD.DE achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than LYP6.DE's 7.48% return.
LEAD.DE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- —
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEAD.DE Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc | 9.44% | 13.89% | 6.93% | 16.25% | -11.84% | 24.71% | 1.30% |
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 7.48% | 20.82% | 8.25% | 15.97% | -10.40% | 24.81% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEAD.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between LEAD.DE and LYP6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LEAD.DE
LYP6.DE
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEAD.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.74 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 6.63 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEAD.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.67 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEAD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum LYP6.DE drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD.DE and LYP6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEAD.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -35.51% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -9.45% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.59% | -16.26% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -20.71% | -0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.62% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -4.84% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.49% | +0.32% |
Volatility
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Europe ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (LEAD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.35%. This indicates that LEAD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEAD.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 4.35% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 10.65% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 12.90% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 14.41% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 15.86% | -1.39% |
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEAD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LEAD.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEAD.DE nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, LEAD.DE and LYP6.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LEAD.DE.
LEAD.DE tracks MSCI Europe ESG Leaders, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LEAD.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.
Find the right allocation for LEAD.DE and LYP6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer