LDUR vs. LTPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).
LDUR and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LDUR is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jan 22, 2014. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009.
Performance
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 0.43% | 5.76% | 5.14% | 4.78% | -4.23% | -0.55% | 4.49% | 4.27% | 1.05% | 2.06% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | -1.26% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | 17.47% | -7.22% | 9.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDUR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LDUR has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 2.51%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.61% annualized return.
LDUR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
LTPZ
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- -3.07%
- 3Y*
- -2.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.66%
- 10Y*
- 0.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDUR has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LDUR vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
LDUR
LTPZ
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDUR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | -0.27 | +2.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | -0.29 | +3.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.96 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | -0.33 | +4.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.57 | -0.65 | +18.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDUR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | -0.27 | +2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | -0.29 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.04 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.21 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between LDUR and LTPZ is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
LDUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than LTPZ's 3.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 4.43% | 4.60% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 2.22% | 0.90% | 2.15% | 3.14% | 2.66% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 2.92% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 3.80% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDUR drawdown since its inception was -8.68%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUR and LTPZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDUR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -40.99% | +32.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -7.82% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | -40.99% | +34.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.68% | -40.99% | +32.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -33.86% | +33.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -12.19% | +11.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 3.94% | -3.69% |
Volatility
LDUR vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) is 0.75%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that LDUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LDUR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 4.00% | -3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 6.47% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86% | 11.23% | -9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.02% | 15.91% | -13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.79% | 15.10% | -12.31% |