LDUR vs. APUE
LDUR (PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF) and APUE (ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while APUE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by ActivePassive. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LDUR returned 5.11%/yr vs 22.12%/yr for APUE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDUR charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for APUE.
Performance
LDUR vs. APUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDUR achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than APUE's 10.99% return.
LDUR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
APUE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDUR vs. APUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 0.91% | 5.76% | 5.14% | 2.94% |
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 10.99% | 17.49% | 23.89% | 18.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDUR and APUE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDUR vs. APUE — Risk / Return Rank
LDUR
APUE
LDUR vs. APUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDUR | APUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.83 | 2.39 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.32 | 3.29 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 3.24 | +1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.64 | 15.17 | +7.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDUR | APUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.39 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.61 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
LDUR vs. APUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDUR drawdown since its inception was -8.68%, smaller than the maximum APUE drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUR and APUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDUR | APUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -18.83% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -8.98% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -18.83% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.58% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -2.07% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 1.92% | -1.73% |
Volatility
LDUR vs. APUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) is 0.44%, while ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that LDUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDUR | APUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 2.84% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 9.08% | -8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55% | 12.20% | -10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 14.65% | -12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 14.65% | -11.88% |
LDUR vs. APUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDUR has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than APUE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDUR vs. APUE - Dividend Comparison
LDUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than APUE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APUE ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.79% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 4.35% | 4.60% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 2.22% | 0.90% | 2.15% | 3.14% | 2.66% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDUR and APUE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APUE has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to LDUR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDUR dropped -8.68% vs APUE's -18.83%.
On 3-year performance, APUE leads with 22.12% vs 5.11% for LDUR. On fees, APUE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, LDUR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, APUE has performed better with a 22.12% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APUE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for LDUR.
LDUR has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.75% for APUE.
LDUR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while APUE is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and ActivePassive. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for LDUR and 0.33% for APUE.
LDUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDUR and APUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer