LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L
LDUK.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF) and ECOM.L (L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while ECOM.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDUK.L returned 9.34%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for ECOM.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDUK.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ECOM.L.
Performance
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDUK.L is traded in GBp, while ECOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ECOM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDUK.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than ECOM.L's 0.39% return.
LDUK.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOM.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 7.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- —
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF | 3.01% | 22.62% | 16.13% | 8.22% | -3.33% | 6.07% |
ECOM.L L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.39% | 3.16% | 4.69% | 15.71% | -12.27% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDUK.L and ECOM.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between LDUK.L and ECOM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
Industrials
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
Consumer Defensive
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
Basic Materials
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
Communication Services
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
-
Utilities
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
-
Technology
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
Energy
LDUK.L
-
ECOM.L
-
Healthcare
LDUK.L
-
ECOM.L
-
Real Estate
LDUK.L
-
ECOM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDUK.L
ECOM.L
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDUK.L | ECOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.58 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 1.51 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDUK.L | ECOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.44 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.14 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.46 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDUK.L drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum ECOM.L drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUK.L and ECOM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDUK.L | ECOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.13% | -26.00% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -12.84% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.46% | -22.44% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.13% | -26.00% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -3.67% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -7.66% | +4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.97% | -1.82% |
Volatility
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOM.L) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDUK.L | ECOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.71% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 12.94% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 16.95% | -2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 17.80% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 17.99% | -2.35% |
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDUK.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDUK.L vs. ECOM.L - Dividend Comparison
LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while ECOM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOM.L L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF | 4.79% | 4.87% | 4.43% | 5.14% | 5.87% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDUK.L and ECOM.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDUK.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDUK.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECOM.L.
LDUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ECOM.L is Technology Equities. LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while ECOM.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDUK.L and 0.49% for ECOM.L.
Find the right allocation for LDUK.L and ECOM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer