LDRC vs. DDV
LDRC (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDRC is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder Index, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. LDRC is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDRC charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
LDRC vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDRC achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 1.92% return.
LDRC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRC vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LDRC iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF | 0.80% | 0.84% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.92% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDRC and DDV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDRC vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
LDRC
DDV
LDRC vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF (LDRC) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDRC | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDRC | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 1.81 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
LDRC vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDRC drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum DDV drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRC and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDRC | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -1.92% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.41% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -0.35% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | — | — |
Volatility
LDRC vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDRC | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24% | 2.69% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 2.69% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 2.69% | -0.18% |
LDRC vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDRC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LDRC vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
LDRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
LDRC iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDRC and DDV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDRC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDRC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
LDRC has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
LDRC is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRC and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for LDRC and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer