PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDOS vs. AVAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LDOS vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDOS achieves a -32.12% return, which is significantly lower than AVAV's -29.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LDOS has underperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 14.97%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.


LDOS

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
-32.12%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
-16.67%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
14.97%

AVAV

1D
-7.14%
1M
5.96%
YTD
-29.48%
6M
-28.63%
1Y
-10.28%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
18.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDOS vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
-32.12%26.50%34.52%4.50%20.04%-14.20%8.95%88.82%-16.72%29.14%
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-29.48%57.18%22.10%47.14%38.09%-28.62%40.75%-9.14%20.99%109.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LDOS and AVAV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LDOS:

$15.64B

AVAV:

$8.32B

EPS

LDOS:

$10.92

AVAV:

-$4.63

PS Ratio

LDOS:

0.92

AVAV:

6.94

PB Ratio

LDOS:

3.12

AVAV:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

LDOS:

$17.33B

AVAV:

$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LDOS:

$3.04B

AVAV:

$104.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

LDOS:

$2.34B

AVAV:

-$242.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDOS vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDOS
LDOS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LDOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LDOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDOS vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDOSAVAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.04

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.17

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

-0.30

-0.79

LDOS vs. AVAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the AVAV Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDOS and AVAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDOS vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDOS drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum AVAV drawdown of -61.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDOS and AVAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDOSAVAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.72%

-61.45%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.73%

-61.45%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.73%

-61.45%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.73%

-61.45%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.29%

-61.45%

+19.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.49%

-58.38%

+19.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-28.71%

+9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.33%

34.44%

-19.11%

Volatility

LDOS vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is 6.30%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 26.86%. This indicates that LDOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDOSAVAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

26.86%

-20.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.00%

57.90%

-32.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.28%

74.35%

-45.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

56.01%

-29.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.48%

52.05%

-24.57%

Dividends

LDOS vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison

LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.36%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%

Financials

LDOS vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.40B
-10.80M
(LDOS) Total Revenue
(AVAV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LDOS and AVAV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAV has higher volatility (26.86%) compared to LDOS (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDOS dropped -54.72% vs AVAV's -61.45%.

AVAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDOS and AVAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer