PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDLVX vs. LLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LDLVX having a 0.82% return and LLDYX slightly lower at 0.78%. Over the past 10 years, LDLVX has underperformed LLDYX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while LLDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.72% annualized return.


LDLVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
2.45%

LLDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
0.82%6.28%4.94%5.75%-5.31%1.21%3.22%5.71%1.54%1.58%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.78%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LDLVX and LLDYX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.63

The correlation between LDLVX and LLDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDLVX vs. LLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDLVX
LDLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LDLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LDLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDLVXLLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.65

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.47

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

13.94

+0.96

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDLVX and LLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDLVXLLDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.86

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.86

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.05

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.09

-0.28

Drawdowns

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDLVX drawdown since its inception was -9.67%, smaller than the maximum LLDYX drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDLVX and LLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDLVXLLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-10.54%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-1.29%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-1.29%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.35%

-7.43%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

-9.67%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.26%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-1.20%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.32%

-0.02%

Volatility

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) at 0.73%. This indicates that LDLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDLVXLLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.73%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.68%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

2.40%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

2.74%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.63%

2.59%

+0.04%

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDLVX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDLVX vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

LDLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than LLDYX's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
5.25%5.29%4.81%4.76%2.64%2.66%3.11%3.86%4.18%2.99%0.00%0.00%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
5.16%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDLVX and LLDYX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDLVX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to LLDYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDLVX dropped -9.67% vs LLDYX's -10.54%.

LDLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDLVX and LLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer