LDLVX vs. EMXC
LDLVX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both funds - LDLVX is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Lord Abbett, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. LDLVX is actively managed, while EMXC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDLVX returned 2.41%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDLVX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDLVX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 39.90% return.
LDLVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 45.10%
- 1Y
- 73.97%
- 3Y*
- 28.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLVX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 0.82% | 6.28% | 4.94% | 5.75% | -5.31% | 1.21% | 3.22% | 5.71% | 1.54% | 0.68% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 39.90% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDLVX and EMXC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDLVX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
LDLVX
EMXC
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDLVX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.60 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 5.16 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.90 | 20.85 | -5.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDLVX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 3.42 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.72 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.54 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDLVX drawdown since its inception was -9.67%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDLVX and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDLVX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -42.81% | +33.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -14.41% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.29% | -19.12% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.35% | -28.91% | +21.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -2.27% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -10.19% | +8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 3.56% | -3.26% |
Volatility
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) is 0.83%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that LDLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDLVX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 9.83% | -9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.59% | 19.41% | -17.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 21.75% | -19.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.79% | 17.45% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.63% | 19.82% | -17.19% |
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDLVX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDLVX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
LDLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than EMXC's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.01% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
LDLVX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 | 5.25% | 5.29% | 4.81% | 4.76% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 3.11% | 3.86% | 4.18% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDLVX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to LDLVX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDLVX dropped -9.67% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDLVX and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer