PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEM vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEM vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.51% return.


LDEM

1D
-3.58%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
4.51%
6M
3.95%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*

VXUS

1D
-3.04%
1M
0.39%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.35%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEM vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LDEM
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
4.51%32.49%5.87%6.49%-22.46%-2.03%16.30%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
12.51%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEM and VXUS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2020

0.82

The correlation between LDEM and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDEM vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEM
VXUS

Financial Services

24.2%
21.7%

Technology

23.4%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
8.2%

Communication Services

10.0%
4.4%

Industrials

7.1%
15.6%

Basic Materials

6.9%
7.6%

Energy

4.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

3.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.8%

Utilities

2.6%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.4%

Financial Services

LDEM
24.2%
VXUS
21.7%

Technology

LDEM
23.4%
VXUS
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LDEM
11.8%
VXUS
8.2%

Communication Services

LDEM
10.0%
VXUS
4.4%

Industrials

LDEM
7.1%
VXUS
15.6%

Basic Materials

LDEM
6.9%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

LDEM
4.2%
VXUS
4.7%

Healthcare

LDEM
3.4%
VXUS
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

LDEM
3.3%
VXUS
4.8%

Utilities

LDEM
2.6%
VXUS
3.0%

Real Estate

LDEM
1.5%
VXUS
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEM vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEM
LDEM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEM vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDEMVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.62

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.47

10.07

-5.60

LDEM vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEM and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDEM vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEMVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-35.97%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-11.27%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-13.58%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.17%

-29.44%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-3.04%

-3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-8.20%

-9.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

2.93%

+1.27%

Volatility

LDEM vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 7.07%. This indicates that LDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEMVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

7.07%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

14.44%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

16.36%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

16.27%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

17.03%

+3.88%

LDEM vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDEM vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than VXUS's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDEM
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
2.94%3.26%2.64%3.20%4.93%1.82%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.59%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEM and VXUS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDEM has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to VXUS (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDEM dropped -40.82% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.35% vs 1.55% for LDEM. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.35% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for LDEM.

LDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 2.59% for VXUS.

LDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. LDEM tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for LDEM and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEM and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer