LDEM vs. VEXC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LDEM (iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - LDEM tracks the MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.

Performance

LDEM vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 20.21% return.

LDEM

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 6.92%
• 6M: 7.76%
• 1Y: 25.33%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: —

VEXC

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 20.21%
• 6M: 23.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEM vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF	6.92%	-0.05%
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	20.21%	4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEM and VEXC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

LDEM vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEM

LDEM Risk / Return Rank: 40
LDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
LDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEM vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDEM	VEXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDEM	VEXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	2.21	-1.95

Drawdowns

LDEM vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and VEXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDEM	VEXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.82%	-12.42%	-28.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.92%	-1.20%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.36%	-2.23%	-15.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LDEM	VEXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.68%	18.89%	-1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	18.89%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.73%	18.89%	+1.84%

LDEM vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LDEM vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison

LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than VEXC's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF	3.04%	3.26%	2.64%	3.20%	4.93%	1.82%	1.89%
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	0.74%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDEM and VEXC in my portfolio?

LDEM and VEXC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDEM or VEXC?

On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDEM or VEXC?

VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for LDEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDEM or VEXC?

LDEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.

What is the main difference between LDEM and VEXC?

LDEM tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for LDEM and 0.07% for VEXC.