LDEM vs. DVYE
LDEM (iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF) and DVYE (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - LDEM tracks the MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index while DVYE tracks the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEM returned 1.89%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for DVYE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVYE.
Performance
LDEM vs. DVYE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than DVYE's 10.48% return.
LDEM
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 6.92%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
DVYE
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
LDEM vs. DVYE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 6.92% | 32.49% | 5.87% | 6.49% | -22.46% | -2.03% | 15.59% |
DVYE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 10.48% | 28.36% | 8.89% | 20.88% | -31.38% | 11.02% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEM and DVYE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between LDEM and DVYE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
LDEM vs. DVYE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEM
DVYE
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
LDEM
DVYE
Consumer Cyclical
LDEM
DVYE
Technology
LDEM
DVYE
Communication Services
LDEM
DVYE
Industrials
LDEM
DVYE
Basic Materials
LDEM
DVYE
Energy
LDEM
DVYE
Healthcare
LDEM
DVYE
-
Consumer Defensive
LDEM
DVYE
Utilities
LDEM
DVYE
Real Estate
LDEM
DVYE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEM vs. DVYE — Risk / Return Rank
LDEM
DVYE
LDEM vs. DVYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.98 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.68 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 4.36 | -2.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 12.49 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.98 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.28 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.16 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
LDEM vs. DVYE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum DVYE drawdown of -47.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and DVYE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -47.42% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -6.49% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -14.63% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | -40.89% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -4.05% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -15.38% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 2.26% | +1.75% |
Volatility
LDEM vs. DVYE - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (DVYE) at 5.67%. This indicates that LDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEM | DVYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.67% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 11.62% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 14.32% | +3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 16.99% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 18.40% | +2.33% |
LDEM vs. DVYE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEM vs. DVYE - Dividend Comparison
LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than DVYE's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 5.13% | 5.88% | 11.81% | 9.05% | 9.89% | 7.31% | 5.27% | 5.97% | 5.69% | 4.81% | 4.56% | 6.53% |
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 3.04% | 3.26% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 4.93% | 1.82% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEM and DVYE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LDEM has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to DVYE (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDEM dropped -40.82% vs DVYE's -47.42%.
On 5-year performance, DVYE leads with 4.79% vs 1.89% for LDEM. On fees, LDEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DVYE has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DVYE has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYE.
DVYE has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 3.04% for LDEM.
LDEM tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while DVYE tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for LDEM and 0.49% for DVYE.
DVYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDEM and DVYE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer