LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L
LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - LDEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR while MEUD.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEG.L returned 16.11%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for MEUD.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDEG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.
Performance
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 6.58% return.
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.58% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEG.L and MEUD.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between LDEG.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Industrials
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Basic Materials
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Utilities
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Energy
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Communication Services
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Healthcare
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Consumer Cyclical
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Consumer Defensive
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Technology
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
Real Estate
LDEG.L
-
MEUD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDEG.L
MEUD.L
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 1.85 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 6.70 | +7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.60 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.71 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.60 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and MEUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -28.57% | +12.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -10.53% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -12.61% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.97% | -17.09% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.33% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -4.16% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.91% | -0.71% |
Volatility
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.57%, while Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.14% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 10.20% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 12.14% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 13.94% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 14.92% | +1.09% |
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LDEG.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEG.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.
LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.
Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and MEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer