LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L
LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - LDEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEG.L returned 16.11%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDEG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return.
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEG.L and LCPE.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.42 |
The correlation between LDEG.L and LCPE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
-
Energy
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Technology
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
LDEG.L
-
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDEG.L
LCPE.L
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 4.13 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 13.66 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.44 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 1.04 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.98 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -27.05% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -6.66% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -12.39% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.97% | -12.39% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -2.71% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -3.52% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.02% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.57%, while Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEG.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.81% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 8.48% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 11.29% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.74% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 20.60% | -4.59% |
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEG.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEG.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer