PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDEG.L is traded in GBp, while BATT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BATT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than BATT.L's 35.68% return.


LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
10.41%
6M
14.16%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*

BATT.L

1D
-2.58%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
35.68%
6M
37.21%
1Y
128.63%
3Y*
24.96%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%
BATT.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
35.68%59.22%0.53%3.36%-3.98%4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEG.L and BATT.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.50

The correlation between LDEG.L and BATT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEG.L
BATT.L

Financial Services

41.5%

-

Industrials

15.8%
33.3%

Basic Materials

9.9%
36.9%

Utilities

8.2%
3.0%

Energy

7.7%

-

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Healthcare

3.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Technology

2.0%
11.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

LDEG.L
41.5%
BATT.L

-

Industrials

LDEG.L
15.8%
BATT.L
33.3%

Basic Materials

LDEG.L
9.9%
BATT.L
36.9%

Utilities

LDEG.L
8.2%
BATT.L
3.0%

Energy

LDEG.L
7.7%
BATT.L

-

Communication Services

LDEG.L
5.2%
BATT.L

-

Healthcare

LDEG.L
3.4%
BATT.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

LDEG.L
3.3%
BATT.L
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

LDEG.L
3.1%
BATT.L

-

Technology

LDEG.L
2.0%
BATT.L
11.8%

Real Estate

LDEG.L

-

BATT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BATT.L
BATT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BATT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDEG.LBATT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.65

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

10.03

-6.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

34.77

-20.95

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is lower than the BATT.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEG.L and BATT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDEG.LBATT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

4.47

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.74

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.78

+0.46

Drawdowns

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum BATT.L drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and BATT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEG.LBATT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-33.29%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-12.91%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-33.29%

+21.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.97%

-33.29%

+17.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-4.31%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-8.89%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.73%

-1.53%

Volatility

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.57%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEG.LBATT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

10.88%

-7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

22.93%

-13.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

28.96%

-17.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

23.60%

-7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

23.55%

-7.54%

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while BATT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BATT.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEG.L and BATT.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.

LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BATT.L is Alternative Energy Equities. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.49% for BATT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and BATT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer