LDEG.L vs. BATT.L
LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while BATT.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEG.L returned 16.11%/yr vs 17.44%/yr for BATT.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDEG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATT.L.
Performance
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDEG.L is traded in GBp, while BATT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BATT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than BATT.L's 35.68% return.
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BATT.L
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 35.68%
- 6M
- 37.21%
- 1Y
- 128.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.44%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 35.68% | 59.22% | 0.53% | 3.36% | -3.98% | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEG.L and BATT.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between LDEG.L and BATT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEG.L
BATT.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
LDEG.L
BATT.L
-
Industrials
LDEG.L
BATT.L
Basic Materials
LDEG.L
BATT.L
Utilities
LDEG.L
BATT.L
Energy
LDEG.L
BATT.L
-
Communication Services
LDEG.L
BATT.L
-
Healthcare
LDEG.L
BATT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
LDEG.L
BATT.L
Consumer Defensive
LDEG.L
BATT.L
-
Technology
LDEG.L
BATT.L
Real Estate
LDEG.L
-
BATT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDEG.L
BATT.L
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.65 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 10.03 | -6.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 34.77 | -20.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 4.47 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.74 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.78 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum BATT.L drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and BATT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -33.29% | +17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -12.91% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -33.29% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.97% | -33.29% | +17.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -4.31% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -8.89% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 3.73% | -1.53% |
Volatility
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.57%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEG.L | BATT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 10.88% | -7.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 22.93% | -13.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 28.96% | -17.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 23.60% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 23.55% | -7.54% |
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEG.L vs. BATT.L - Dividend Comparison
LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while BATT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEG.L and BATT.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.
LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BATT.L is Alternative Energy Equities. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.49% for BATT.L.
Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and BATT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer