LDDR vs. BCKT
LDDR (LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF) and BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDDR is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while BCKT is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
LDDR vs. BCKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDDR achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than BCKT's 0.56% return.
LDDR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.97%
BCKT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.26K | $6.23K | $9.65K | |
| $32.58K | $36.70K | $75.17K |
LDDR vs. BCKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LDDR LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF | -0.40% | 0.77% |
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 0.56% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDDR and BCKT is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDDR vs. BCKT — Risk / Return Rank
LDDR
BCKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LDDR vs. BCKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) and LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDDR | BCKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDDR vs. BCKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDDR drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, which is greater than BCKT's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDDR and BCKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDDR | BCKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -1.00% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -0.34% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -0.29% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility
LDDR vs. BCKT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDDR | BCKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 1.54% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 1.54% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 1.54% | +2.39% |
LDDR vs. BCKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LDDR and BCKT have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LDDR vs. BCKT - Dividend Comparison
LDDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, less than BCKT's 20.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 20.31% | 5.36% |
LDDR LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF | 12.83% | 14.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LDDR and BCKT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDDR and BCKT have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 20.31%, compared with 12.83% for LDDR.
LDDR is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while BCKT is Government Bonds.
Find the right allocation for LDDR and BCKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer