LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L
LDCU.L (PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist) and SSHY.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - LDCU.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SSHY.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LDCU.L returned 2.92%/yr vs 5.51%/yr for SSHY.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDCU.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SSHY.L.
Performance
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDCU.L is traded in USD, while SSHY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SSHY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDCU.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than SSHY.L's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LDCU.L has underperformed SSHY.L with an annualized return of 2.92%, while SSHY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.51% annualized return.
LDCU.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.92%
SSHY.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDCU.L PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 0.48% | 6.54% | 5.24% | 6.22% | -5.40% | -0.39% | 4.57% | 7.01% | 1.01% | 3.32% |
SSHY.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 1.26% | 9.05% | 8.33% | 11.07% | -4.83% | 4.74% | 3.41% | 10.94% | -0.88% | 5.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDCU.L and SSHY.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2014 | 0.13 |
The correlation between LDCU.L and SSHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDCU.L
SSHY.L
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (LDCU.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDCU.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.77 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 11.73 | -4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDCU.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.53 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 0.74 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.63 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDCU.L drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, smaller than the maximum SSHY.L drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDCU.L and SSHY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDCU.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -21.77% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -2.58% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.10% | -5.07% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | -9.73% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.42% | -21.77% | +12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.07% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -1.67% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.61% | -0.02% |
Volatility
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (LDCU.L) is 0.78%, while PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that LDCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDCU.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 1.40% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 3.72% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98% | 4.67% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 6.64% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 7.44% | -4.75% |
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDCU.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SSHY.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDCU.L vs. SSHY.L - Dividend Comparison
LDCU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than SSHY.L's 7.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDCU.L PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 4.48% | 4.42% | 4.40% | 3.45% | 1.93% | 1.77% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.75% | 2.26% | 2.37% | 2.13% |
SSHY.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 7.07% | 7.33% | 7.48% | 6.52% | 4.86% | 4.47% | 5.24% | 5.27% | 5.10% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDCU.L and SSHY.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDCU.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDCU.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SSHY.L.
LDCU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SSHY.L is High Yield Bonds. LDCU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for LDCU.L and 0.55% for SSHY.L.
Find the right allocation for LDCU.L and SSHY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer