LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L
LDCU.L (PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist) and IUCB.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - LDCU.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD while IUCB.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDCU.L returned 2.29%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for IUCB.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDCU.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IUCB.L.
Performance
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDCU.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than IUCB.L's 0.43% return.
LDCU.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.92%
IUCB.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- —
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDCU.L PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 0.48% | 6.54% | 5.24% | 6.22% | -5.40% | -0.39% | 4.57% | 7.01% | 1.01% | 3.32% |
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 7.84% | 4.54% | 7.17% | -9.26% | -1.61% | 7.94% | 8.74% | -3.80% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDCU.L and IUCB.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016 | 0.32 |
The correlation between LDCU.L and IUCB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Technology
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Communication Services
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Consumer Cyclical
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Real Estate
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Utilities
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Industrials
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Healthcare
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Energy
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Consumer Defensive
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Basic Materials
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDCU.L
IUCB.L
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (LDCU.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDCU.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.60 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 8.50 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDCU.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.47 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.48 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDCU.L drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, smaller than the maximum IUCB.L drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDCU.L and IUCB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDCU.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -14.12% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -2.00% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.10% | -3.53% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | -14.00% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.61% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -3.64% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.61% | -0.02% |
Volatility
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (LDCU.L) is 0.78%, while SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that LDCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDCU.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 1.09% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 2.46% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98% | 3.77% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 5.24% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 7.66% | -4.97% |
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDCU.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCB.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDCU.L vs. IUCB.L - Dividend Comparison
LDCU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than IUCB.L's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.67% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 3.89% | 2.62% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDCU.L PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 4.48% | 4.42% | 4.40% | 3.45% | 1.93% | 1.77% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.75% | 2.26% | 2.37% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDCU.L and IUCB.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for LDCU.L.
LDCU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while IUCB.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for LDCU.L and 0.12% for IUCB.L.
Find the right allocation for LDCU.L and IUCB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer