LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L
LDCU.L (PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist) and CBS5.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Corporate Bonds funds - LDCU.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD while CBS5.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LDCU.L returned 5.39%/yr vs 5.12%/yr for CBS5.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDCU.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CBS5.L.
Performance
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDCU.L is traded in USD, while CBS5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CBS5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDCU.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than CBS5.L's 0.25% return.
LDCU.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.92%
CBS5.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDCU.L PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 0.48% | 6.54% | 5.24% | 6.22% | -0.72% |
CBS5.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.25% | 7.30% | 4.27% | 5.56% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDCU.L and CBS5.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022 | 0.23 |
The correlation between LDCU.L and CBS5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDCU.L
CBS5.L
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (LDCU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDCU.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.10 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 7.25 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDCU.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.68 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDCU.L drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, which is greater than CBS5.L's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDCU.L and CBS5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDCU.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -5.49% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -1.98% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.10% | -2.13% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.82% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -0.90% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.57% | +0.02% |
Volatility
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (LDCU.L) is 0.78%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that LDCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBS5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDCU.L | CBS5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 1.36% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 3.32% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98% | 4.21% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 5.90% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 5.90% | -3.21% |
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDCU.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CBS5.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDCU.L vs. CBS5.L - Dividend Comparison
LDCU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, while CBS5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBS5.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDCU.L PIMCO US Low Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 4.48% | 4.42% | 4.40% | 3.45% | 1.93% | 1.77% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.75% | 2.26% | 2.37% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDCU.L and CBS5.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBS5.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBS5.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for LDCU.L.
LDCU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while CBS5.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for LDCU.L and 0.20% for CBS5.L.
Find the right allocation for LDCU.L and CBS5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer