PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDAP.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDAP.L is traded in USD, while DEL2.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DEL2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDAP.L achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than DEL2.L's -2.76% return.


LDAP.L

1D
1.71%
1M
-1.56%
6M
15.58%
YTD
17.12%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*

DEL2.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-8.13%
YTD
-2.76%
1Y
-1.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDAP.L
L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis
17.12%35.59%3.81%9.13%-8.93%-99.00%
DEL2.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.76%55.69%23.51%38.94%-32.05%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LDAP.L and DEL2.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.63

The correlation between LDAP.L and DEL2.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDAP.L
LDAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LDAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LDAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DEL2.L
DEL2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DEL2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDAP.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDAP.LDEL2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.02

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

-0.07

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

-0.21

+6.43

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the DEL2.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDAP.L and DEL2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDAP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than DEL2.L's maximum drawdown of -68.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDAP.L and DEL2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDAP.LDEL2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.33%

-68.93%

-30.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-27.05%

+16.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.47%

-29.73%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.61%

-56.47%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.38%

-8.94%

-89.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-98.71%

-18.99%

-79.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

8.86%

-4.82%

Volatility

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDAP.L) is 4.91%, while L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that LDAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEL2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDAP.LDEL2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

9.63%

-4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

28.89%

-15.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

33.93%

-18.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.07%

36.96%

-8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.15%

37.64%

+13.51%

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LDAP.L and DEL2.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

LDAP.L vs. DEL2.L - Dividend Comparison

LDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while DEL2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DEL2.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDAP.L
L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis
3.83%4.23%4.86%5.25%4.92%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDAP.L and DEL2.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDAP.L and DEL2.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

LDAP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while DEL2.L is Leveraged Equities. LDAP.L tracks L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis, while DEL2.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDAP.L and DEL2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer