PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCVB.DE (Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist) and XLIQ.DE (Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - LCVB.DE tracks the iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1 while XLIQ.DE tracks the iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCVB.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLIQ.DE.

Performance

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

LCVB.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.94%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*
-0.35%

XLIQ.DE

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist		0.94%0.95%2.69%2.15%-10.56%-1.94%1.32%1.70%-0.05%0.35%
XLIQ.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF		0.27%1.87%2.30%6.61%-18.10%-3.39%2.42%5.38%-0.44%0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LCVB.DE and XLIQ.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.28

The correlation between LCVB.DE and XLIQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist

Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF

Often compared with LCVB.DE:
LCVB.DE vs. SPPS.DELCVB.DE vs. SUA0.DELCVB.DE vs. EUNT.DELCVB.DE vs. ECR3.DELCVB.DE vs. EXHE.DELCVB.DE vs. JER5.DELCVB.DE vs. XDEP.DE
Often compared with XLIQ.DE:
XLIQ.DE vs. CWBXLIQ.DE vs. ECR3.DEXLIQ.DE vs. EFRN.DEXLIQ.DE vs. IE3E.DEXLIQ.DE vs. JER5.DEXLIQ.DE vs. IB26.DEXLIQ.DE vs. ECR1.DE

Return for Risk

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LCVB.DE
LCVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
XLIQ.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LCVB.DEXLIQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.44

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.47

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LCVB.DEXLIQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

—

—

Drawdowns

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LCVB.DEXLIQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.50%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

—

—

Volatility

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LCVB.DEXLIQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.54%

—

—

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCVB.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLIQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCVB.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCVB.DE nor XLIQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.51%0.82%1.26%1.51%1.80%2.86%0.31%0.49%
XLIQ.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

LCVB.DE and XLIQ.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCVB.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLIQ.DE.

LCVB.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1, while XLIQ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LCVB.DE and 0.20% for XLIQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCVB.DE and XLIQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer