LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE
LCVB.DE (Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist) and QDVL.DE (iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - LCVB.DE tracks the iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1 while QDVL.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LCVB.DE returned -0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QDVL.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCVB.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for QDVL.DE.
Performance
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCVB.DE achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than QDVL.DE's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LCVB.DE has underperformed QDVL.DE with an annualized return of -0.35%, while QDVL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.90% annualized return.
LCVB.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 0.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.08%
- 10Y*
- -0.35%
QDVL.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 0.90%
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCVB.DE Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist | 0.94% | 0.95% | 2.69% | 2.15% | -10.56% | -1.94% | 1.32% | 1.70% | -0.05% | 0.35% |
QDVL.DE iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.74% | 2.81% | 4.24% | 4.30% | -3.63% | -0.34% | 0.56% | 0.80% | -0.61% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCVB.DE and QDVL.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2016 | 0.25 |
The correlation between LCVB.DE and QDVL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LCVB.DE
QDVL.DE
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCVB.DE | QDVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 2.08 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 8.99 | -7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCVB.DE | QDVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.65 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 1.01 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.31 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.32 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.50%, which is greater than QDVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCVB.DE and QDVL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCVB.DE | QDVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -8.22% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -0.93% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.44% | -0.93% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.73% | -4.90% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.50% | -8.22% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -0.01% | -6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -0.71% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.22% | +0.46% |
Volatility
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) is 0.10%, while iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) has a volatility of 0.34%. This indicates that LCVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCVB.DE | QDVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.34% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 1.02% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55% | 1.18% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.75% | 1.58% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 2.86% | -0.32% |
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCVB.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCVB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison
LCVB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCVB.DE Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.82% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.80% | 2.86% | 0.31% | 0.49% |
QDVL.DE iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.95% | 1.95% | 0.31% | 0.13% | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCVB.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCVB.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for QDVL.DE.
LCVB.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LCVB.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.
Find the right allocation for LCVB.DE and QDVL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer